Pera-Frangissa • Season 2025

The fifth modern excava­ti­on cam­paign at the sanc­tua­ry of Fran­gis­sa has yiel­ded what may be the most spec­ta­cu­lar results to date. As in pre­vious years, the­se pro­jects, led by Dr Mat­thi­as Recke (Uni­ver­si­ty of Frank­furt) and Prof. Dr Phil­ipp Kobusch (Uni­ver­si­ty of Ros­tock), were gene­rous­ly sup­port­ed by the Amricha in Leip­zig and Argo Frank­furt. The rural Apol­lo sanc­tua­ry was alre­a­dy the sub­ject of a brief excava­ti­on cam­paign in 1885 under the direc­tion of the archaeo­lo­gist Max Ohne­falsch-Rich­ter. Howe­ver, apart from brief notes, his work was never published or continued—and the loca­ti­on of the sanc­tua­ry was for­got­ten. It was only through the new field rese­arch that the sanc­tua­ry could be re-loca­ted, and the old excava­tions unco­ver­ed and docu­men­ted accor­ding to modern stan­dards, while rese­arch into pre­vious­ly unex­cava­ted are­as was advanced.

When it was first dis­co­ver­ed in 1885, the sanc­tua­ry was remar­kab­le for the high den­si­ty of finds—the bases of the voti­ve sta­tu­es stood side by side. Howe­ver, when the site was back­fil­led, the­se bases were lar­ge­ly remo­ved by Ohne­falsch-Rich­ter and later used to refill the area. This makes the 2025 dis­co­very of more than 20 bases still in their ori­gi­nal locations—which Ohne­falsch-Rich­ter pre­su­ma­b­ly did not see—all the more remar­kab­le. Some of the bases even still con­tai­ned the feet of the voti­ve sta­tu­es that had stood on them. In addi­ti­on to lime­s­tone, the­re were also ter­ra­cot­ta feet. This pro­vi­des the first evi­dence ever found in Cyprus that ter­ra­cot­ta figu­res were not only pla­ced on the ground or in rock car­vings, but were also given their own lime­s­tone bases.

The new­ly dis­co­ver­ed bases are not only arran­ged clo­se­ly tog­e­ther but are in some cases even sta­cked on top of one ano­ther, though always in such a way that both figu­res remain visi­ble. This allows us, for the first time, to trace the gra­du­al accu­mu­la­ti­on of voti­ve offe­rings in the sanc­tua­ry. Fur­ther­mo­re, based on the stra­ti­gra­phic sequence careful­ly obser­ved during the new excava­tions, it can now be demons­tra­ted that the­se bases were cover­ed with a leve­ling lay­er alre­a­dy in anti­qui­ty. The area was leve­led, and then a com­ple­te­ly new lay­er of bases was installed—these are the bases that Ohne­falsch-Rich­ter excava­ted and of which the new excava­tions found well over 100 pie­ces in the refill of the old excava­ti­on. The ques­ti­on of whe­ther this reor­ga­niza­ti­on of the sanctuary—presumably toward the end of the Archaic period—was the result of a des­truc­tion, as a few clues sug­gest, or was mere­ly due to a lack of space, will be the focus of the next campaigns.

With the dis­co­very of the Archaic bases in situ and the asso­cia­ted sta­tu­es, which can be dated to the Archaic peri­od, the Archaic pha­se of the sanc­tua­ry can now be veri­fied through archaeo­lo­gi­cal evi­dence for the first time ever. Until now, the only arte­facts known from this peri­od were lar­ge­ly con­text-free sta­tu­es dis­co­ver­ed during the 1885 excava­tions. Fur­ther­mo­re, during this cam­paign, undis­tur­bed lay­ers con­tai­ning Archaic pot­tery were iden­ti­fied for the first time sin­ce the start of modern excava­tions, ther­eby adding his­to­ri­cal depth to the sanc­tua­ry as a who­le. Thus, the new excava­tions can help to trace the deve­lo­p­ment of a Cypri­ot sanc­tua­ry in detail and to under­stand the social and ritu­al pro­ces­ses that led to the sanctuary’s design and the pla­ce­ment of the voti­ve offerings.